Crash Course US History #8, The Constitution and Federalism — notes and timestamps

Updated 2026-10-11 · Video: CrashCourse, published 2013-03-21 · 13 min

Watch the video (13 min)

Watch the original video on YouTube

Episode 8 of John Green’s Crash Course US History covers the years right after the Revolution, when the new country had to work out how to govern itself. In 13 minutes it moves from the first national government, the Articles of Confederation, through the crisis of Shays’ Rebellion, to the 1787 convention in Philadelphia that wrote the Constitution, and on to the ratification fight between Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Green’s thread is that the framers feared two kinds of tyranny at once: an overbearing government and, in their eyes, too much democracy. These notes follow the episode in order, explain each compromise in plain terms, mark the jokes, and correct a few dates and shortcuts. Episode 7 (the American Revolution) is useful background.

Key takeaways

  1. The Constitution was the second national government, not the first. The Articles of Confederation came before it and set up only a loose “league of friendship” among the states (0:39).
  2. The Articles failed mainly because Congress could not tax. It could make war and treaties but had to ask the states for money, and changing the Articles needed every state to agree (1:34).
  3. The Articles government still did two big things: it won the war, and the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 set out how new states would be formed north of the Ohio River, with slavery banned there (2:10).
  4. Shays’ Rebellion pushed elites toward a stronger government. Debt, taxes and foreclosures led Massachusetts farmers to close the courts in 1786–87 (3:12).
  5. The Constitution is a bundle of compromises: large states against small (the Great Compromise) and free states against slave states (the three-fifths and fugitive slave clauses) (6:14).
  6. Two guards against government tyranny: separation of powers with checks and balances, and federalism, which splits power between the nation and the states (8:00).
  7. Two guards against “too much democracy”: senators chosen by state legislatures, and a president chosen by the Electoral College (8:47).
  8. Ratification was a real fight. The Federalist Papers argued for a strong national government; the Anti-Federalists’ fear of a distant, elite-run government never fully went away (9:45).

Chapter notes

0:00 – 0:39 Did the world copy the US Constitution?

Green opens with a mock-patriotic claim that the whole world envies and copies the American form of government. His producer, Stan, corrects him off camera, and the joke becomes the question of the episode: why did most other countries not adopt the American system? The answer comes in pieces later on: the Electoral College, the Senate’s design and the deliberate limits on democracy are unusual, and few later constitutions copied them exactly.

John Green at his desk gesturing toward a globe, with a chalkboard reading We the People behind him
0:36 — Green points at the globe's "not-America" areas. The chalkboard's "We the People" is the opening of the Constitution's preamble, the document this episode is about.

0:39 – 2:10 The Articles of Confederation: a weak government by design

Before the Constitution, the states were joined by the Articles of Confederation, the first national framework, adopted by the Continental Congress. Green calls it simply bad. What it set up:

  • One body only. A single-house Congress of state delegations, with one vote per state whatever its size.
  • No executive and no national courts. John Hanson, often called the “first president”, was only the presiding officer of Congress, not a head of government.
  • High thresholds. Major decisions needed 9 of the 13 states, a two-thirds supermajority. Green says any decision; strictly, the 9-state rule applied to big questions such as war, treaties, coining money and borrowing, while routine business needed a simple majority. Even so, getting nine states to agree was hard.
  • Limited powers. Congress could declare war, run foreign affairs, make treaties and coin money, but it could not collect taxes. It had to request money from the states, which often did not pay.
  • Almost impossible to amend. Changes needed all 13 states, so the Articles were never amended.

Why so weak? Americans had just fought a war against a government that taxed them without consent and quartered soldiers in their homes. A strong central power looked like the danger, not the solution.

A date correction: Green says the Articles “only lasted 10 years”. The Articles were drafted in 1777 but not ratified by all states until 1781 (Maryland was last), and they were replaced when the new government began in 1789. So they were formally in force for about eight years. Likewise, the “first presidential election” he dates to 1788 was held from December 1788 to January 1789.

Close-up of the handwritten parchment of the US Constitution showing We the People and Article 1
0:41 — The opening of the Constitution's parchment, "We the People" and Article I. This is the system in use since 1789, and Green's point is that it was not the first try.
Printed title page reading Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union
0:49 — A printed title page of the "Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union". The "perpetual" union lasted less than a decade.
Engraving of Independence Hall beside colored cut-out shapes of the thirteen states fitting together into a map
1:15 — The thirteen states slide together beside Independence Hall. Under the Articles each piece stayed largely sovereign, with one equal vote in Congress.
Green-tinted portrait of John Hanson in an 18th-century wig on a starry background, labelled Fig 8.1 John Hanson, 'Murica Moment
1:22 — A "'Murica Moment" card for John Hanson. He presided over Congress in 1781–82, but the post had no executive power, so he was not a "first president" in the modern sense.
Black and white engraving of George Washington on horseback leading troops in the snow
1:39 — Washington leads troops in an engraving. Making war and treaties was the main job the Articles were built for.
Green at his desk beside an image of an old paper banknote and an on-screen note about Continental currency
1:49 — A Continental banknote and the show's note: printing money without taxes to back it caused serious wartime inflation, and by 1790 Continental dollars were worth about 1% of face value. This is the origin of the phrase "not worth a Continental".
Colored print of four British soldiers in red coats and tall hats
2:04 — British redcoats, for the colonists' memory of soldiers quartered in their homes. That fear of standing armies explains why the Articles kept the center weak.

2:10 – 3:12 What the Articles government did get done

Green gives the Articles credit for two things.

First, the Confederation government won the war, ending with the Treaty of Paris in 1783. Green adds that independence was hardly a victory for enslaved people or Native Americans, a point the rest of the chapter bears out.

Second, it made rules for the lands west of the Appalachians and north of the Ohio River, then called the Northwest because it lay north and west of the settled states. That land was home to Native nations, so the first step was treaties. At Fort Stanwix (1784) and Fort McIntosh (1785), Native leaders gave up claims north of the Ohio under heavy pressure. Green compares this with the Athenians’ line to the Melians in Thucydides, roughly “the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must”: these treaties were imposed far more than negotiated.

The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 was the Articles government’s biggest achievement. It laid out how the territory would be governed and how it would become three to five new states, admitted as equals of the original thirteen (they became Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan and Wisconsin). Two features matter:

  • It said Native peoples’ land should not be taken without their consent and that they should be treated in “good faith”, an admission that their claims were real, though the promise was broken again and again.
  • It banned slavery in the territory. Green uses his “foreshadowing filter” here, because the line between free and slave states becomes the central conflict of the next 70 years.
Old map of the eastern United States showing Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia and the Carolinas and the lands to the west
2:26 — An early map of the new republic. The "Northwest" was the region beyond the Ohio River, now the Midwest.
Animated clip from Crash Course World History showing ancient warships, labelled The Persians and Greeks
2:41 — A callback to *Crash Course World History* on the Greeks. Athens' message to the island of Melos in 416 BCE, as told by Thucydides, is the model for "treaty-making" by the stronger side.
Printed text of the Treaty of Fort Stanwix between the United States and the Six Nations
2:47 — The printed Treaty of Fort Stanwix with the Six Nations (the Haudenosaunee, or Iroquois). Its first articles deal with hostages and boundaries, a sign of who held the upper hand.
Animated map of North America with the Great Lakes region highlighted, labelled Fig 8.2 Northwest Ordinance of 1787
2:54 — The Northwest Territory highlighted around the Great Lakes. Its states would join the Union on equal footing, a pattern later used for most of the West.
Green at his desk in dim light with fog and a moon behind him, the foreshadowing filter
3:10 — The "foreshadowing filter" as Green notes the ban on slavery. Slavery's spread into new territory is the issue that eventually leads to the Civil War.

3:12 – 4:24 Debt, tariffs and Shays’ Rebellion

For Green the Articles had one fatal flaw: no power to tax. Both Congress and the states owed huge sums from the war. Their main hope for revenue was tariffs (taxes on imports), but Congress could not set them, so each state did its own, which made foreign trade chaotic. Britain, still sore about losing, also kept American ships out of its markets.

The pressure fell on ordinary people. In western Massachusetts, the state raised taxes to pay its debts, and courts began seizing the farms of indebted farmers. In 1786–87, armed farmers closed the courts to stop the foreclosures. This was Shays’ Rebellion, named for Daniel Shays, a Revolutionary War veteran and indebted farmer. The state militia (an army largely paid for by Boston merchants) put it down early in 1787, and Congress could do nothing to help.

Reactions split:

  • Thomas Jefferson, then in Paris as the US minister to France, was relaxed about it. His famous lines that “a little rebellion” is a good thing and that the tree of liberty must be refreshed with blood come from two separate 1787 letters, not one speech. Green notes this is easy to say when you are not the one bleeding.
  • Most elites were alarmed. To them it showed that too much democracy among poor debtors could threaten property. People who held government bonds also feared they would never be repaid without a government that could tax.

Green’s summary: when the rich think something must be done, something usually is.

Painting of the Declaration of Independence being presented, with papers on the table edited to read IOU and Past Due Notice
3:22 — John Trumbull's famous painting of the Declaration being presented, with a joke added: the papers on the table now read "IOU" and "Past Due Notice". The revolutionaries' war left them deep in debt.
Unfinished painting showing only the American delegates at the Treaty of Paris, with an on-screen note
3:33 — Benjamin West's unfinished painting of the 1783 peace talks. The show's note explains why it is half empty: the British delegation refused to pose, so only the Americans appear. A neat image of British "crankiness" after the war.
Old woodcut of two men in military coats and hats, Daniel Shays and Job Shattuck
3:46 — A period woodcut of Daniel Shays with another rebel leader. Shays was a former Continental Army captain, one of many veterans who came home to debts they could not pay.
Portrait of Thomas Jefferson with reddish-grey hair and a white collar
3:56 — Thomas Jefferson, who watched the rebellion from France and was far less worried than his friends at home.
On-screen quotation in large letters beginning A little rebellion now and then is a good thing
4:01 — Jefferson's "little rebellion" quote on screen. The video joins it to the "tree of liberty" line, which Jefferson actually wrote in a different letter later that year.

4:24 – 6:14 Thought Bubble: from Annapolis to Philadelphia

  • Annapolis, 1786. A meeting called to improve trade rules among the states drew so few delegates that it could do nothing except call for another meeting. Green says six states attended; the usual count is five, since some states named delegates who did not arrive in time. The plan was to meet in Philadelphia the next year to “revise” the Articles.
  • Philadelphia, 1787. The delegates took “revise” loosely. Instead of patching the Articles, they wrote a new Constitution, which, with amendments, is still in force.
  • Who they were. Fifty-five delegates attended (Rhode Island sent none). Green stresses they were not demigods, but they were unusual for their time: most were wealthy, more than half had been to college when almost no one had, and about 40% had served in the war. All wanted a stronger national government.
  • What they agreed on: three branches (executive, legislative, judicial), and a republic, government by elected representatives rather than direct democracy.
  • Where they disagreed. Alexander Hamilton, the strongest champion of central power, proposed that the president and senators serve for life (strictly, “during good behaviour”). It went nowhere, because the delegates wanted to guard against two tyrannies: tyranny by the government and tyranny by the people.
  • The Electoral College is Green’s example of the second guard. Americans still do not vote for the president directly; electors do. The figure of 538 electors dates from 1964, after the District of Columbia was given electors; the number grows with the House.

Green’s jab that American leaders never export American-style elections is a fair point about the Electoral College, which few democracies copied.

Animated title banner reading Sec 8.0 The Constitution, with a row of founders and Uncle Sam above it
4:24 — The Thought Bubble title card for the Constitution section.
Animated scene of six delegates in a mostly empty hall standing near a poster reading Trade Rules
4:32 — The Annapolis meeting: a handful of delegates, a sheet of "Trade Rules" and many empty chairs. Its real result was the call for the Philadelphia convention.
Animated delegates in a large hall with green curtains gathered around a document reading We the People
4:50 — The delegates in Philadelphia turn a revision into a brand-new document. They met in what is now called Independence Hall from May to September 1787.
Animated founders floating above a table with light shining on them, flags behind
4:57 — The framers lifted into the air like saints, for Green's point that they were not gods. Treating them as infallible makes it harder to see the compromises they made.
Animated founders standing on a big pile of gold coins against a pink background
5:09 — The delegates on a pile of gold. Most were men of property, which shaped their worry about debtor uprisings.
Animated chalkboard titled Branches of Government listing executive, legislative, judicial and a crossed-out supernatural
5:24 — The three branches on a chalkboard, with a joke fourth branch, "supernatural", crossed out.
Animated Alexander Hamilton raising his arms in a darkened hall as a crown descends from above
5:33 — Hamilton reaches for a crown, for his plan of life terms. The cartoon exaggerates: he did not propose a king, but critics did accuse him of wanting something close to monarchy.
Animated framers standing in front of a domed government building, surrounded by dark silhouettes of ordinary people
5:53 — The framers hemmed in by a crowd of silhouettes. This is the second fear, "tyranny by the people", that shaped the Senate and the Electoral College.
Animated stage with a screen labelled Democracy showing a ghostly founder figure above a ballot box, and an audience in silhouette
6:01 — "Democracy" as a ghostly figure on a stage, watched by the crowd from a distance. The framers wanted the people's choice to pass through electors rather than reach the presidency directly.
Green at his desk beside a graphic of a cross with the word Free
6:10 — A side joke with the Thought Bubble about Canada's elections and free health care. Not part of the history.

6:14 – 7:12 Large states against small states: the Great Compromise

The first big fight at the convention was over representation.

  • Virginia Plan (backed by large states, mainly James Madison’s design): a two-house legislature, with seats in both houses based on population.
  • New Jersey Plan (backed by small states, presented by William Paterson): a single house with one equal vote per state, much like the Articles. Green’s sneers at New Jersey are a running gag, not analysis.
  • Great (Connecticut) Compromise, brokered by Roger Sherman of Connecticut: two houses. The House of Representatives is based on population, with two-year terms; the Senate has two members per state, with six-year terms, and a third of the Senate is elected every two years.

The House was meant to respond quickly to voters; the Senate was meant to be slower and steadier. Green’s quip that the Senate was designed “to never pass anything” is a joke about modern gridlock, but it does point at the real intent: the Senate was built to cool and delay.

Old map of Virginia with a portrait of James Madison in the corner
6:27 — Virginia, the most populous state, and James Madison, the main author of the Virginia Plan. Representation by population favored states like his.
Old map of New Jersey with Pennsylvania to the west
6:34 — New Jersey, squeezed between bigger neighbors. Its plan gave every state the same weight.
Green beside a cartoon icon of a tanned man in sunglasses and a vest
6:43 — A reality-TV New Jersey joke as Green dismisses the plan. In fact the New Jersey Plan shaped the result: the Senate's equal votes per state come from it.
Dark portrait of Roger Sherman, a stern older man in a plain coat
6:48 — Roger Sherman of Connecticut, who brokered the compromise (with fellow delegate Oliver Ellsworth). He is the only person to have signed the Declaration, the Articles and the Constitution, as well as the 1774 Continental Association.
Photograph of the modern US Senate chamber filled with senators
7:09 — The Senate today: two members per state regardless of population, the same rule the compromise wrote in 1787.

7:12 – 8:00 Slavery in the Constitution

Counting by population raised a second question: who counts? Slaveholding states wanted enslaved people counted, to gain seats, even though they could not vote and were treated as property. States with few enslaved people objected. Green is blunt that the objection was about power, not equality; nearly all the delegates held racist views.

  • Three-fifths compromise. A state’s population for House seats (and for direct taxes) was its free population plus three-fifths of “all other persons”. The text avoids the word “slave”. Green says it is “still in the Constitution”; the words remain in the original text, but the Fourteenth Amendment (1868) replaced the rule.
  • Fugitive slave clause. People who escaped from slavery had to be returned, even from a state that had banned slavery. Free states were in effect required to help enforce slavery inside their own borders, a conflict that erupted in the 1850s. The Thirteenth Amendment (1865), which abolished slavery, made the clause void.
Animated graphic of white colonists in a top row and enslaved Black people in a bottom row, labelled Fig 8.3 3/5ths Compromise
7:33 — The three-fifths compromise as a counting rule. Every five enslaved people counted as three for representation, adding to slaveholding states' power in the House and in the Electoral College.
Painting of a Civil War battle with soldiers fighting near a stone bridge
7:58 — "Spoiler alert": a Civil War battle scene. The compromises over slavery postponed the conflict rather than settled it.

8:00 – 8:47 Separation of powers, checks and balances and federalism

Leaving slavery aside, as Green says with some irony, the framers really did fear tyranny. They used two principles against it.

  1. Separation of powers with checks and balances. Power is split among the legislative, executive and judicial branches, and each can restrain the others. Congress passes laws; the president can veto them; Congress can override a veto with two-thirds of each house; courts can strike laws down.
  2. Federalism. Authority is shared between the national government and the states. Green is a citizen of both the United States and Indiana. The national government is supposed to keep to its enumerated powers, the list in Article I, Section 8, while most other matters, especially health, safety and morals (often called “police powers”), stay with the states. The Tenth Amendment (1791) later made the point explicit.

On the courts, Green says judges gave themselves the power to void laws and that you will not find it in the Constitution. That is fair as far as it goes: judicial review is not spelled out in the text. But it was not invented from nothing. Hamilton argued for it in Federalist No. 78, and the Supreme Court claimed it in Marbury v. Madison (1803) under Chief Justice John Marshall.

The Capitol, the White House and the Supreme Court building laid over the parchment of the Constitution
8:16 — The three branches as buildings: the Capitol (Congress), the White House (president) and the Supreme Court, set on the document that creates and limits them.
Portrait of John Marshall beside Green with an on-screen note about Marbury v. Madison and judicial review
8:25 — John Marshall and the show's note: *Marbury v. Madison* established judicial review, a topic the series returns to with Jefferson's presidency.
Indiana driver license with Green's photo and personal details blacked out
8:35 — Green's Indiana driver's license, a simple example of dual citizenship under federalism. Licensing drivers is a state power, not a national one.
Parchment of the Constitution with three red panels listing the powers of Congress from Article I Section 8
8:39 — The enumerated powers of Congress from Article I, Section 8: taxing, borrowing, regulating commerce, coining money, declaring war, raising armies and more, ending with the "necessary and proper" clause that later fueled arguments over implied powers.

8:47 – 9:31 Guarding against “too much democracy”

The framers, mostly wealthy, also worried that poor and indebted voters might elect leaders who would cancel debts or redistribute property, the fear Shays’ Rebellion had sharpened. Two features of the Constitution hedged against that.

  • The Senate was not elected by the people. Senators were chosen by the states, in practice by state legislatures, on the theory that they would be leading, more reliable citizens. Green mocks that theory with a list of later senators’ scandals. Direct election of senators came only with the Seventeenth Amendment in 1913.
  • The Electoral College. Electors were expected to be educated men of property who would choose more wisely than the general public. Green notes that it can elect a president who lost the national popular vote, which has happened several times, including in 2000, and says that is partly the point. A note: the Constitution let each state decide how to choose its electors, and many state legislatures originally picked them directly.
Green at his desk with photos of two modern politicians in the corner
9:11 — Photos of modern scandal-hit politicians for Green's joke about the "leading citizen" theory of the Senate. The final item on his list, shooting Alexander Hamilton, refers to Aaron Burr, a former senator who was vice president when he killed Hamilton in an 1804 duel.

9:31 – 10:15 Ratification and the Federalist Papers

Green ends the convention story with praise: the Constitution has lasted remarkably well. Nation-states are fairly recent in world history, and the US Constitution is the oldest written national constitution still in use.

It still had to be approved. The Constitution would take effect once 9 of the 13 states ratified it in special state conventions. New Hampshire became the ninth in June 1788, and the key large states, Virginia and New York, followed that summer. North Carolina (1789) and Rhode Island (1790) held out until the new government was already running.

To win over the New York convention in particular, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay wrote 85 essays for newspapers in 1787–88, signed with the pen name “Publius”. Collected as The Federalist (the Federalist Papers), they argue that a strong national government is necessary and need not threaten liberty. Hamilton wrote 51 of them, Madison 29 and Jay 5.

Green at his desk beside a card showing a Crash Course World History clip labelled Nationalism
9:40 — A pointer to the *World History* episode on nationalism, for the idea that the nation-state is a fairly new invention.
Old German-language map of the eastern seaboard of North America with the states colored
9:53 — The thirteen states on a period map. Ratification needed nine state conventions, not the unanimous approval the Articles required.
Portraits of John Jay, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton over a printed page headed Federalist No. 1
10:00 — The three authors, Jay, Madison and Hamilton, over the first essay, addressed "To the People of the State of New-York".
Scroll reading The Federalist, a collection of essays in favor of a new Constitution
10:04 — The essays as a book. Today they are read as the best guide to what supporters thought the Constitution meant.

10:15 – 11:31 Mystery Document: Federalist No. 29 on the militia

The Mystery Document is a passage arguing that an army can never threaten the people’s liberty as long as there is a large body of armed, trained citizens ready to defend their rights, and that such a citizen militia is the best substitute for, and protection against, a standing army. Green guesses correctly: it is from the Federalist Papers, by Alexander Hamilton. It is No. 29, on the militia.

Green then rants about the Second Amendment, joking that if its purpose was for citizens to match the government’s army, it would now cover drones and suitcase nukes. Some things to sort out:

  • Timing. Federalist No. 29 (January 1788) was written before the Second Amendment existed. Hamilton was defending the new Congress’s power to organize and discipline state militias, not explaining an amendment. The Bill of Rights, including the Second Amendment, was drafted by Madison in 1789 and ratified in 1791.
  • The rant is opinion. What the Second Amendment protects is still argued over. In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Supreme Court held that it protects an individual right to keep a handgun at home for self-defense, while allowing some regulation.
  • The Hamilton jokes. The “gunshot” punchline refers to his death in a duel with Aaron Burr in 1804.
Wide shot of the set with a Mystery Document banner over an empty gold armchair and Green at his desk
10:15 — The Mystery Document set: guess the author or get shocked.
Quotation in large dark letters on a parchment background, beginning If circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army
10:31 — The passage from Federalist No. 29. Its argument: a well-trained citizen militia makes a standing army less dangerous, or less necessary.
Green-tinted portrait of Alexander Hamilton on a starry red background labelled Fig 8.3 Alexander Hamilton, 'Murica Moment
10:57 — The answer: Alexander Hamilton. (The card reuses the label "Fig 8.3", already given to the three-fifths graphic.)
Green in the armchair beside a diamond-shaped icon of a figure holding a weapon
11:07 — The drones-and-nukes riff. It is commentary on a modern debate, not part of the 1780s story.
Green in the armchair beside an icon of a founder in a wig holding a pistol
11:27 — Hamilton with a dueling pistol, for the joke about how he died. Burr shot him at Weehawken, New Jersey, in July 1804.

11:31 – 12:29 The Anti-Federalists, and a vague starting point

Green asks us not to ignore the losers. The Anti-Federalists opposed ratification, and some of their ideas still shape American politics.

  • Who they were. Mostly small farmers and ordinary people less tied to commerce, in contrast to the wealthier Federalists. They saw little need for a government that would promote trade and protect creditors.
  • What they feared. A strong central government dominated by the rich. Writers such as James Winthrop of Massachusetts (writing as “Agrippa”) argued that a large union would act like an empire and that no extensive empire can be governed on republican principles. They pointed to Britain and, further back, Rome.
  • Their alternative. Smaller, closer governments, meaning the states, would be more responsive and better at protecting rights.

The Federalists won, but the Anti-Federalists left two marks. Several states ratified only on the understanding that a bill of rights would be added, which became the first ten amendments in 1791. And the argument over how big the national government should be never ended. (Madison’s famous answer to the “too big to be a republic” argument, in Federalist No. 10, was that a large republic with many competing interests would make it harder for any one faction to take over.)

Green’s closing point: the Constitution was a starting point, short and often vague, and its details would be worked out in politics and, eventually, on the battlefield.

On-screen quotation on a green background reading That no extensive empire can be governed upon republican, with a Republican Party elephant logo
12:02 — The Anti-Federalist quote on screen. The elephant logo is a visual pun: "republican" here means government by elected representatives, not the Republican Party, which was not founded until 1854.

Skip list

  • 0:13 – 0:34 Stan’s correction, the “Libertage” gag and the theme music.
  • 6:06 – 6:14 The Canada aside with the Thought Bubble.
  • 11:20 – 11:31 The Hamilton gunshot jokes.
  • 12:29 – 13:03 Credits and the next-episode card.

Key terms

  • Articles of Confederation — the first national framework of government (ratified 1781), a loose union with a one-house Congress, one vote per state and no power to tax.
  • Northwest Ordinance (1787) — the law setting up the territory north of the Ohio River, with a path to statehood for three to five states and a ban on slavery.
  • Shays’ Rebellion (1786–87) — an uprising of indebted Massachusetts farmers who closed courts to stop foreclosures.
  • Annapolis Convention (1786) — a poorly attended meeting on trade that called for the Philadelphia convention.
  • Constitutional Convention (1787) — the meeting in Philadelphia that replaced the Articles with the Constitution.
  • Republic — a government run by elected representatives rather than by citizens voting directly on laws.
  • Virginia Plan / New Jersey Plan — rival proposals for representation by population (large states) or one vote per state (small states).
  • Great (Connecticut) Compromise — Roger Sherman’s solution: a House based on population and a Senate with two members per state.
  • Three-fifths compromise — counting three-fifths of the enslaved population when apportioning House seats and direct taxes.
  • Fugitive slave clause — the requirement that people escaping slavery be returned to their enslavers.
  • Separation of powers — dividing government among legislative, executive and judicial branches.
  • Checks and balances — the ways each branch can limit the others, such as the veto and judicial review.
  • Judicial review — courts’ power to strike down laws that conflict with the Constitution, established in Marbury v. Madison (1803).
  • Federalism — the sharing of power between the national government and the states.
  • Enumerated powers — the powers the Constitution lists for Congress, mainly in Article I, Section 8.
  • Electoral College — the body of electors, chosen by each state, that formally elects the president.
  • Ratification — formal approval; the Constitution needed nine state conventions.
  • Federalist Papers — 85 essays by Hamilton, Madison and Jay, signed “Publius”, urging ratification.
  • Anti-Federalists — opponents of ratification who feared a strong, distant national government.

Review questions

  1. Why did Americans in the 1770s and 1780s want a weak central government?
  2. What could Congress do under the Articles of Confederation, and what could it not do?
  3. Why was the lack of a power to tax such a serious problem for the Articles government?
  4. What did the Northwest Ordinance establish, and why does Green “foreshadow” its ban on slavery?
  5. What caused Shays’ Rebellion, and why did it alarm so many political and economic leaders?
  6. How were the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan different, and how did the Great Compromise combine them?
  7. How did the three-fifths compromise and the fugitive slave clause protect slavery?
  8. What two kinds of tyranny did the framers want to prevent, and which features of the Constitution guard against each?
  9. Explain separation of powers and federalism in your own words, with one example of each.
  10. What were the main arguments of the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists during ratification?

FAQ

Why did the Articles of Confederation fail?

The Articles created a deliberately weak central government: a one-house Congress in which each state had one vote, with no president and no national courts. Its biggest flaw was that Congress could not tax. It had to ask the states for money and could not set tariffs, so it could not pay the war debt or manage trade. Major decisions needed 9 of the 13 states and amendments needed all 13, so the system could not fix itself. Shays' Rebellion in Massachusetts (1786–87) convinced many leaders that it had to be replaced.

What was the Great Compromise?

It was the deal, brokered by Roger Sherman of Connecticut, that settled the fight between large and small states at the 1787 Constitutional Convention. Large states backed the Virginia Plan (representation by population in both houses); small states backed the New Jersey Plan (one vote per state, as under the Articles). The compromise created a House of Representatives based on population, with two-year terms, and a Senate with two members per state, with six-year terms.

What was the three-fifths compromise?

It was the rule that, when a state's population was counted for seats in the House, the free population was counted in full plus three-fifths of 'all other persons', meaning enslaved people. The Constitution never uses the word 'slave'. The clause gave slaveholding states extra seats and electoral votes for people who could not vote. It was replaced after the Civil War by the Fourteenth Amendment (1868).

What is federalism?

Federalism means that power is divided between a national government and the state governments, and citizens belong to both. The national government is meant to be limited to the powers the Constitution lists, such as taxing, regulating trade between states and with other nations, coining money and declaring war. Most everyday matters, such as health, safety and policing, are left to the states.

Who were the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists?

Federalists supported ratifying the Constitution and a stronger national government; Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay made their case in the 85 essays of the Federalist Papers. Anti-Federalists opposed it. They tended to be small farmers and local leaders who feared that a large, distant government run by the wealthy would threaten liberty, and they argued that only smaller, state-level governments could stay truly republican. They lost the ratification fight but won a major concession: the Bill of Rights, ratified in 1791.

Studying another course? Paste its YouTube or Bilibili link on the home page to request a handout — or make your own with the desktop app (coming soon).

Updated 2026-10-11 · By Yao

Not affiliated with the creators, universities or companies whose videos are covered here. Videos belong to their creators; this site only adds commentary.

Sources & credits

How these notes were made

A human watched the full video and wrote these notes with AI assistance for drafting. Stills are limited to a handful of frames used for commentary, each linked to its timestamp; no transcript is reproduced. Spot an error? Let us know via the contact page.